![]() ![]() On the proposed circumvention methods, for reasons I think that anybody can understand, I won't go on much detail, because even though I personally like discussing the technical side of things like this in the open, I don't want to get involved or help anyone doing any nasty thing with what might be the hard work of another person. However, PackSquash is the only OSS I know that has this functionality, and as far as I know its latest v0.3.0-rc.1 version has the most through protection I've seen and that you can probably get, given the limitations that were previously stated in this thread. Some servers even roll out their own obfuscation method, probably using some private program or script. I know for sure that ItemsAdder and PackSquash are not the only programs in existence that obfuscate packs. On the other hand, some Discord user sent me a resource pack ZIP file that was presumably generated by ItemsAdder, and I can confirm that the obfuscation techniques are different. If he did so, he should also publicily disclose the source code and license information of the PackSquash version he uses, because the PackSquash AGPL 3.0 license requires so, and I don't definitely see any of that in that page (although I didn't pay for the plugin or reached him out to confirm this). I'm planning on releasing a new version with lots of improvements and changes soon, but it's pretty usable right now.Ĭlick to expand.I don't think he uses my tool within his program. But you should think about whether you want to make life harder for players, or even yourself, if it turns out that future Minecraft versions change how they parse ZIP files or your only copy of a resource pack is the "protected" ZIP fileīy the way, thank you for mentioning my tool! I feel honored it's interesting for some of you. ![]() That's the whole point of the "protection", of course. Vanilla Minecraft doesn't support any proper encryption mechanism, so this obfuscation is weak by design. Also, from a technical standpoint, it was interesting for me to make something like that possible. However, I left the option to do so because at the very least it's a way of saying "hey, I don't want you to fiddle around with my resource pack, thanks". ![]() As the author of PackSquash, the tool that was linked above that optimizes and "protects" resource packs, I can confirm this is very true. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |